分享最新优惠信息
购买主机更加划算

AlphaVPS德国纽伦堡VPS测评：AMD EPYC+DDR4+NVMe+双程直连线路

2024-03-13 分类：主机测评 阅读(128) 评论(0)

为满足用户对高性能VPS的使用需求，AlphaVPS商家陆续推出AMD系列VPS，包括EPYC和Ryzen CPU核心，位于德国纽伦堡和保加利亚索菲亚两个数据机房，后期也会开通英国、美国等机房。

对于AlphaVPS EPYC CPU核心VPS，采用的是AMD EPYC 7002和7003、DDR4、企业级NVMe SSD阵列，1Gbps带宽，自带一个IPv4+原生IPv6，月付价格低至3.99欧元，整体硬件配置都比较不错。

在本文当中，小编将主要对AlphaVPS德国纽伦堡机房EPYC VPS进行简单的测评，看看整体硬件配置和访问速度怎么样，适不适合选用。当然，测试数据仅供参考。

内存 CPU 硬盘 流量/带宽 租用价格 购买地址
2GB 1核心 10GB NVMe 1TB/1Gbps 3.99欧元/月 点此购买
4GB 1核心 25GB NVMe 2TB/1Gbps 4.99欧元/月 点此购买
8GB 2核心 45GB NVMe 2TB/1Gbps 7.99欧元/月 点此购买
16GB 2核心 90GB NVMe 2TB/1Gbps 15.99欧元/月 点此购买
24GB 4核心 135GB NVMe 4TB/1Gbps 23.99欧元/月 点此购买
32GB 4核心 180GB NVMe 4TB/1Gbps 31.99欧元/月 点此购买
48GB 4核心 270GB NVMe 6TB/1Gbps 47.99欧元/月 点此购买
64GB 4核心 360GB NVMe 10TB/1Gbps 63.99欧元/月 点此购买

测试方案配置：AMD EPYC 7002，2GB内存、25GB硬盘，未开启BBR加上功能，YABS测试的基本硬件配置信息如下：

Basic System Information:
---------------------------------
Uptime     : 0 days, 0 hours, 2 minutes
Processor  : AMD EPYC 7002 1-Core Processor
CPU cores  : 2 @ 4491.560 MHz
AES-NI     : ✔ Enabled
VM-x/AMD-V : ✔ Enabled
RAM        : 960.8 MiB
Swap       : 1024.0 MiB
Disk       : 23.7 GiB
Distro     : Debian GNU/Linux 12 (bookworm)
Kernel     : 6.1.0-11-amd64
VM Type    : KVM
IPv4/IPv6  : ✔ Online / ✔ Online

IPv6 Network Information:
---------------------------------
ISP        : WebNX, Inc.
ASN        : AS18450 WebNX, Inc.
Host       : WebNX, Inc.
Location   : Nuremberg (ON)
Country    : Germany

fio Disk Speed Tests (Mixed R/W 50/50) (Partition /dev/vda2):
---------------------------------
Block Size | 4k            (IOPS) | 64k           (IOPS)
  ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ----
Read       | 320.48 MB/s  (80.1k) | 1.11 GB/s    (17.3k)
Write      | 321.33 MB/s  (80.3k) | 1.11 GB/s    (17.4k)
Total      | 641.82 MB/s (160.4k) | 2.23 GB/s    (34.8k)
           |                      |
Block Size | 512k          (IOPS) | 1m            (IOPS)
  ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ----
Read       | 1.68 GB/s     (3.2k) | 1.62 GB/s     (1.5k)
Write      | 1.77 GB/s     (3.4k) | 1.73 GB/s     (1.6k)
Total      | 3.46 GB/s     (6.7k) | 3.36 GB/s     (3.2k)

iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv4):
---------------------------------
Provider        | Location (Link)           | Send Speed      | Recv Speed      | Ping
-----           | -----                     | ----            | ----            | ----
Clouvider       | London, UK (10G)          | 759 Mbits/sec   | 574 Mbits/sec   | 127 ms
Scaleway        | Paris, FR (10G)           | busy            | busy            | 134 ms
NovoServe       | North Holland, NL (40G)   | 774 Mbits/sec   | 108 Mbits/sec   | 140 ms
Uztelecom       | Tashkent, UZ (10G)        | 224 Mbits/sec   | 380 Mbits/sec   | 236 ms
Clouvider       | NYC, NY, US (10G)         | 873 Mbits/sec   | 754 Mbits/sec   | 61.0 ms
Clouvider       | Dallas, TX, US (10G)      | 743 Mbits/sec   | 455 Mbits/sec   | 38.6 ms
Clouvider       | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | 928 Mbits/sec   | 908 Mbits/sec   | 52.8 ms

iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv6):
---------------------------------
Provider        | Location (Link)           | Send Speed      | Recv Speed      | Ping
-----           | -----                     | ----            | ----            | ----
Clouvider       | London, UK (10G)          | 789 Mbits/sec   | 536 Mbits/sec   | 128 ms
Scaleway        | Paris, FR (10G)           | busy            | busy            | 139 ms
NovoServe       | North Holland, NL (40G)   | 755 Mbits/sec   | 120 Mbits/sec   | 140 ms
Uztelecom       | Tashkent, UZ (10G)        | 168 Mbits/sec   | 263 Mbits/sec   | 227 ms
Clouvider       | NYC, NY, US (10G)         | 864 Mbits/sec   | 637 Mbits/sec   | 60.8 ms
Clouvider       | Dallas, TX, US (10G)      | 884 Mbits/sec   | 794 Mbits/sec   | 36.7 ms
Clouvider       | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | 888 Mbits/sec   | 722 Mbits/sec   | 52.8 ms

Geekbench 6 Benchmark Test:
---------------------------------
Test            | Value
                |
Single Core     | 1912
Multi Core      | 2110

YABS completed in 16 min 54 sec

国内部分地区ping延迟测试，平均在189ms的样子，对于德国机房来说，这个ping延迟已经相当低了：

ping延迟测试

电信去程路由节点测试，走的是163骨干网直连telia线路，比较的给力：

电信去程路由节点

电信回程路由节点，德国retn网络直连对接163骨干网回来的：

traceroute to 220.191.194.34 (220.191.194.34), 30 hops max, 60 byte packets
 1  * * *
 2  10.0.1.1 (10.0.1.1)  0.412 ms  0.412 ms  0.513 ms
 3  ae2-400.RT.NBG.NUE.DE.retn.net (87.245.244.194)  0.713 ms  0.713 ms  0.710 ms
 4  ae20-7.RT.IRX.FKT.DE.retn.net (87.245.234.66)  3.096 ms  3.116 ms  3.113 ms
 5  GW-ChinaTelecom.retn.net (87.245.236.153)  4.060 ms  4.070 ms  4.061 ms
 6  * * *
 7  * 202.97.51.242 (202.97.51.242)  212.895 ms *
 8  202.97.83.2 (202.97.83.2)  209.700 ms 202.97.66.253 (202.97.66.253)  202.148 ms 202.97.71.37 (202.97.71.37)  202.071 ms
 9  202.97.102.30 (202.97.102.30)  202.092 ms 202.97.101.214 (202.97.101.214)  223.344 ms 202.97.101.22 (202.97.101.22)  192.393 ms
10  220.191.194.34 (220.191.194.34)  204.026 ms  207.329 ms *

移动去程路由节点测试，移动CMI线路直连德国core-backbone网络到达机房：

移动去程路由节点

移动回程路由节点，和去程一样，走移动CMI国际骨干网线路回来：

traceroute to 221.183.67.209 (221.183.67.209), 30 hops max, 60 byte packets
 1  * * *
 2  10.0.1.1 (10.0.1.1)  0.410 ms  0.426 ms  0.585 ms
 3  ae0-422.nbg40.core-backbone.com (81.95.8.217)  0.574 ms  0.394 ms  0.391 ms
 4  ae1-2003.fra20.core-backbone.com (80.255.14.82)  3.147 ms  3.160 ms  3.135 ms
 5  ipv4.de-cix.fra.de.as58453.chinamobile.com (80.81.195.121)  7.589 ms  7.600 ms  7.585 ms
 6  223.120.10.41 (223.120.10.41)  7.570 ms  7.256 ms 223.120.10.85 (223.120.10.85)  7.229 ms
 7  223.120.16.6 (223.120.16.6)  135.086 ms 223.120.14.174 (223.120.14.174)  116.697 ms 223.120.16.14 (223.120.16.14)  134.983 ms
 8  221.183.55.102 (221.183.55.102)  134.694 ms 221.183.55.110 (221.183.55.110)  127.714 ms 221.183.55.106 (221.183.55.106)  135.321 ms
 9  221.183.25.201 (221.183.25.201)  135.914 ms 221.183.46.250 (221.183.46.250)  133.384 ms  133.314 ms
10  221.183.89.122 (221.183.89.122)  136.733 ms  136.217 ms  147.682 ms
11  221.183.67.209 (221.183.67.209)  183.612 ms  185.502 ms  186.474 ms

联通去程路由节点，走的是联通AS4837线路直连：

联通去程路由节点

联通回程路由节点线路，走的是twelve99网络对接联通AS4837线路回到国内：

traceroute to 61.48.75.177 (61.48.75.177), 30 hops max, 60 byte packets
 1  * * *
 2  10.0.1.1 (10.0.1.1)  0.612 ms  0.615 ms  0.637 ms
 3  ae0-422.nbg40.core-backbone.com (81.95.8.217)  0.633 ms  0.727 ms  0.724 ms
 4  ae1-2001.fra10.core-backbone.com (81.95.15.162)  4.062 ms  4.043 ms  3.979 ms
 5  ffm-b5-link.ip.twelve99.net (62.115.9.225)  79.892 ms  80.192 ms  80.292 ms
 6  ffm-bb2-link.ip.twelve99.net (62.115.136.218)  3.970 ms ffm-bb1-link.ip.twelve99.net (62.115.114.88)  3.524 ms ffm-bb1-link.ip.twelve99.net (62.115.136.212)  3.556 ms
 7  ffm-b14-link.ip.twelve99.net (62.115.132.209)  5.668 ms ffm-b11-link.ip.twelve99.net (62.115.124.117)  3.985 ms ffm-b14-link.ip.twelve99.net (62.115.132.209)  5.621 ms
 8  219.158.34.241 (219.158.34.241)  3.909 ms 219.158.34.93 (219.158.34.93)  3.587 ms *
 9  219.158.14.85 (219.158.14.85)  162.607 ms 219.158.6.77 (219.158.6.77)  143.579 ms 219.158.14.149 (219.158.14.149)  167.409 ms
10  219.158.4.45 (219.158.4.45)  176.920 ms 219.158.3.133 (219.158.3.133)  119.228 ms 219.158.4.33 (219.158.4.33)  163.892 ms
11  219.158.3.93 (219.158.3.93)  152.492 ms 219.158.18.65 (219.158.18.65)  146.097 ms 219.158.3.93 (219.158.3.93)  167.914 ms
12  219.158.19.225 (219.158.19.225)  176.153 ms  146.708 ms *
13  61.48.75.177 (61.48.75.177)  125.134 ms  125.215 ms  117.472 ms

晚高峰时段的丢包抖动测试，国外情况肯定好很多，国内丢包情况也还可以，整体比较稳定吧：

丢包抖动测试

小结

以上就是对AlphaVPS德国纽伦堡VPS的大致测评情况，在配置方面比较不错，毕竟是AMD EPYC、DDR4和NVMe主流配置，整体性能应该不会差。在网络方面比较吃惊，竟然三网去程和回程都是直连德国机房，虽然是国内访问，低延迟也不亚于美西岸机房。

当然，如果你对访问速度要求较高，那么AlphaVPS德国纽伦堡VPS可能不是最佳选择，毕竟地理位置距离我我国较远。如果对访问速度不是和在意，或者访客群体位于欧美地区，那么这也是一个不错的选择，毕竟价格便宜，性能配置尚佳。

未经允许不得转载：惠主机 » AlphaVPS德国纽伦堡VPS测评：AMD EPYC+DDR4+NVMe+双程直连线路
标签：

相关文章